Folks, meet Thomas Lamb,
This past week Lamb, now 81, underwent gender reassignment surgery paid for by Kansas Taxpayers. He has now been moved to the Kansas Women's prison, Topeka Correctional Facility.
None of the inmates nor security staff are to know about this person's history nor previous gender. In fact, the only reason anyone knows is that medical staff had to be informed (over the objections of several highly placed administrators) due to them being post surgery and requiring an extended stay in the clinic before being introduced to the general population.
What are your thoughts on this? Is this an acceptable use of taxpayer dollars? What about housing this individual with a female population?
Here's where I'm at. Yes, this person is 81, but is apparently in very good health. They are over 6 foot tall, 200lbs and fit. Their crimes were specific against women. Kidnapping, rape, and killing. They also have a history of escape.
While I have no problem whatsoever with the trans population, I do strongly object to tax dollars being used for gender reassignment surgery at this point. I am even more against this individual being housed with the female population considering their crimes. Add to it the secrecy from KDOC, hiding their identity, their crimes, and their history from security.
But, at the same time, this does beg the question, what do we do with trans inmates? Where should they be housed? Should there be gender reassignment surgery available to the inmate population? Who should pay for it? Thoughts?
Kidnapping occurred 50 years ago
Fifty years ago this week, on Jan. 15, 1970, ex-convict Thomas P. Lamb used a gun to kidnap 18-year-old Patricia Childs from the parking lot of an Overland Park shopping mall. That abduction and th…
www.cjonline.com
This past week Lamb, now 81, underwent gender reassignment surgery paid for by Kansas Taxpayers. He has now been moved to the Kansas Women's prison, Topeka Correctional Facility.
None of the inmates nor security staff are to know about this person's history nor previous gender. In fact, the only reason anyone knows is that medical staff had to be informed (over the objections of several highly placed administrators) due to them being post surgery and requiring an extended stay in the clinic before being introduced to the general population.
What are your thoughts on this? Is this an acceptable use of taxpayer dollars? What about housing this individual with a female population?
Here's where I'm at. Yes, this person is 81, but is apparently in very good health. They are over 6 foot tall, 200lbs and fit. Their crimes were specific against women. Kidnapping, rape, and killing. They also have a history of escape.
While I have no problem whatsoever with the trans population, I do strongly object to tax dollars being used for gender reassignment surgery at this point. I am even more against this individual being housed with the female population considering their crimes. Add to it the secrecy from KDOC, hiding their identity, their crimes, and their history from security.
But, at the same time, this does beg the question, what do we do with trans inmates? Where should they be housed? Should there be gender reassignment surgery available to the inmate population? Who should pay for it? Thoughts?