Search results

Pretty sure Seven is in for S3 as she was the one who commented on filming having finished and how it felt. If she hadn't been involved somehow, I don't think she would have commented about it the same.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-04-27/buying-real-estate-with-crypto-new-mortgages-are-backed-by-coins

Not to mention we're 2 years in and haven't even broken double digits on this thread...

Consider the following: 1) What is the opportunity cost of voting? A few hours every 2 years? Is there any harm in casting a vote, or is the worst case neutral i.e. "it does nothing"? 2) If you could spend a minimal effort and resources to take an action with a 0.01% chance of success, but said...

The reasoning is that RvW was decided by a "Right to Privacy" which Alito and the originalists seem to not see as existing in the constitution. All these cases were decided on that same Right to Privacy. and Alito even called out two off this very list in the draft. If Precedent no longer...

Other court cases decided on the same "Right to Privacy" that RvW was decided on, that this will open up challenges for:

Something about the way it leads into the drums at the start doesn't really jibe well for me. Other than that, not bad, and I could pick out bits of the TOS theme being remixed into it.

It seems like it could have been grey constitutionally at least(as digital copying like this didn't exist when that clause was written, so was the intent based around preventing access to the owner or was it also privacy-related - which is the stance the professor seems to take) if there wasn't...

Batman might not even need his utility belt though - his real superpower is preparation. If he had some reason to expect mud-wrestling with Spider-Man, he'll prepare for it somehow

Was it set in actual solid legal precedent before this though? Because to requote one of the professor's statements, That sounds like what you're describing, and again what really seems to take the prof aback is that it's not acknowledged at all. Am I correct in that via this decision, due to...

It happens to me too, and it's only topics that I haven't looked at in a long while, while other topics that have been more actively followed never run into it.

They still haven't added Home compatibility last I heard, so no way to move them over yet. Or has that changed?

If you read the thread, the issue is that none of that reasoning was referred to in the decision. And the decision itself is what is used in precedent, and there was no other current decisions relevant to this sort of thing. Thus this could have knock-on effects as tech companies take advantage...

Not at the supreme court yet, but it's for the jurisdiction where all the US tech companies fall under:

It’s not DNS There’s no way it’s DNS It was DNS

Reminder that it still has to be voted on by shareholders(though it'll probably pass because money) so the deal isn't 100% yet. Anyways, we all know the real reason he did it was to remove the @ElonJet account and anything critical of his companies.

Well it IS a random thought!

On the other hand....

My Iguanus seems fine. For whatever reason all the pegs were extremely tight too, and I thought I was going to break the motorcycle windshield piece clicking it into position at first.