I like representation, but I've always felt race swapping is faux representation. Many people find inspiration or solace in their cultural heritage but you have to work hard to make it so Black Jimmy Olsen isn't White Jimmy Olsen in Blackface.
I kinda feel the same, but note that DC has a
lot of characters that use the
Magical Negro/Native/Foreigner trope (where a white man encounters a person of colour who teaches them their ways/mystically empowers them/hands them a priceless cultural artifact, which the white man then uses to become a superhero). Modern adaptations prefer to "fix" this racism by omitting the person of colour entirely, but a
better solution is to simply racebend the characters so that they actually reflect their origins.
(Famous examples include Roy Harper [Speedy/Red Arrow/Arsenal], who was raised on a Navajo reservation after his [white] father died, Alan Scott [Green Lantern], who "found" what he thought was an ancient ring on a trip to China and just
pocketed it, Garfield Logan [Beast Boy], whose American family went to Africa because Africans can't study virology, and Max Mercury, who was a white settler child who befriended the local Blackfoot tribe, and was given super-speed [and a made-up "Indian name" in a language that does not appear to be Siksika] by the dying medicine-man after the tribe is murdered.)
(Notably, racebending Max Mercury actually
improves his story; using his speed, he hop-scotches through time, getting a front-row seat to the atrocities committed against his people, justifying his checkered past [he's been an outlaw, a hero, a villain, an anti-hero, and finally a cynical old man who just wants to be left alone]. He eventually ends up living in Central City, when he senses Barry Allen getting struck by the Lightning.)
As for the Superman family specifically, Jimmy and Perry have been black before (in the Beeboverse and Snyderverse, respectively), and it kinda works for Jimmy. The Olsen family seem to be Irish (judging by the name and the red hair), and while it's all but forgotten now, anti-Irish discrimination was still around in the 1930/40s when Jimmy was forming (he started out as a nameless extra, then got named and redesigned over the years). It was never as bad as what African-Americans faced, but there are still a lot of clearly-delineated Irish-Catholic areas in big cities (they started out as ghettos for the immigrants).
There's also precedence for Lois to be latina (like Luz); let me explain some backstory:
Back in the 40s and 50s, before "modern" superhero comics took off, Westerns were the big thing (everyone remembers Jonah Hex, but he was just one of a whole posse). Even into the 70s (when superhero comics were entering their Bronze Age), DC was still publishing an anthology comic called "
Weird Western Tales." WWT introduced a character called Lazarus Lane, who (with the help of yet another Native medicine-man
) became a masked vigilante called El Diablo. In DC's Bronze-Age Earth-One stories, Lazarus was identified as an ancestor of Lois.
Lazarus' ethinicity was never specifically identified (he was drawn white, but in America in the 70s, that doesn't mean much), but note that "El Diablo" isn't necessarily a name a white man would pick.
Lazarus continued to exist (as a footnote) in the Post-Crisis era, but he was not expressly linked to the modern Lanes --though he
did have a modern descendant, Rafael Sandoval, a D-list hero who also used the "El Diablo" name (in a 16-issue series from 89-91). Sandoval explicitly has latino ancestry, which is further evidence that Lazarus might have as well.
If there was any need to "justify" racebending Lois, it would be a simple as mentioning her cousin Rafael. (And if you need an excuse why this isn't often mentioned, Lois' father is usually portrayed as a right-wing conservative military man, who might have deliberately downplayed that bit of his heritage.)
(Hell, this'd make a neat bit of parallelism; have Lois discover and investigate her family history at the same time as Clark learns more about his Kryptonian heritage.)
The change they seem to be making to Krypton's destruction is...interesting, I guess. They seemed to be in a middle of a war, instead of Krypton exploding due to a natural disaster. Jor-El sporting a eyepatch like a war hero is a new look. I guess there's more story possibilities to that, but I don't know if I necessarily like the change.
My best guesses on who Krypton were at war with? Mongul and his Warworld. Or Darkseid and Apokalips. Or Brainiac. Maybe Rogol Zaar? Whoever it was, I think they might have used a Sun-Eater to turn their sun red.
Depending on how they play with continuity, Krypton might have been at war with
everyone. Historically (in some continuities), Kryptonians were
not the good guys; while Pre-Crisis Krypton was portrayed as a shining utopia of crystals and togas (with Jor-El as an example of their intellect and wisdom), Post-Crisis Krypton was a cold imperialist dystopia with a caste system and a repressive culture (with Jor-El as a renegade who wanted his son to be
better). Part of General Zod's motivation was to restore/establish a tyrannical Kryptonian Empire, and I'm sure a lot of worlds breathed a sigh of relief when the Kryptonian homeworld ceased to exist.
When word (eventually) gets out about a surviving Kryptonian on Earth, a lot of very dangerous people get
very interested in an undefended backwater planet.
And we never see Lois actually WRITE anything, so she might not have written the story the Daily Planet published. In a lot of Superman stories, Lois is...a very good "investigator" but not the best at actually putting words on paper...or spelling.
I also feel it's possible that Perry's trying to protect Lois from herself. I think there might be more to their relationship than we know right now. Maybe he's a old friend of her family's? He might be a little overprotective for a reason.
There might also be (perfectly mundane) legal issues with allowing an intern to claim a front-page story and Lois and Jimmy are wildly over-reacting.
But yeah, Lois' journalistic shortcomings are one reason she's typically paired up with Clark; Lois is a dogged investigator who knows how to ask tough questions and never lets go of a story --but all of her articles read like police reports. Clark, OTOH, is an amazingly compelling writer, with a strong personal "voice" --but he's too timid and non-confrontational ("mild-mannered") to ask the tough questions or dig too deeply into other peoples' secrets (because he has secrets of his own to protect).
Together they could win a Pulitzer.