My understanding of synthahol may be weak. I am sure I learned that you don't get drunk. Do you get a buzz and then that is it?
It really may be that the normal mature thing is that we don't NEED to get high and anyone who thinks they do need to get high is wrong.
It is hard for me to ever disagree with Copper Bezel. It's all true. I can see it isn't great stuff. But just like Copper, I like it anyway.
-=-=-
Am I too out of touch with the related trappings? I seems to me that by the 25th Century there might be substances that you can carry around...
I hope that he is really innocent and gets exonerated.
But it starts to look like it is time for casting actors in multi-project roles should come with a psych eval. They bet a LOT on this guy.
I actually haven't seen "These Are the Voyages" since it originally aired. It didn't offend me very much what they did, but I just haven't ever gone back. It would make a lot of sense not to have exteriors in the episode since it was from Riker's perspective in the holodeck and he wouldn't...
No one would want that to be their truth, but if it is in fact their truth, a lot of people who had only a month to live would want to know it so that they could get and give some closure with loved ones and make arrangements. Their will so they know others will be taken care of. Bills and...
At the start of Star Trek 2, Enterprise is assigned to training and Spock is her captain. In Star Trek 6, they say Enterprise-A will be mothballed. Not ground up for scrap.
We don't necessarily see contrary to that. The scenes are aboard Titan and in the administrator's office.
Jack and...
I do like the show, but sloppy writing is everywhere. He didn't know so that Seven could tell him. Not enough thought into how the whole scene fit together.
I guess there is a sort of sense in it that construction of 1701-A was begun before it was clear that Excelsior would be the successor so they were just still building what they knew. Still it just doesn't sit well with me that they'd build a ship and then retire it in less than 10 years even...
I have always assumed the Enterprise-A was the ship we saw disabled at the start of Star Trek 4. A starship crew cannot survive very long with no power, so there'd be no one to mind when it got a new name and crew. I just went to look and apparently there is very little said, but what is said...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.