Well, it's not "obscenity" if it has "literary, artistic, political, or scientific value", and parody is protected political speech.
So what would probably actually happen is a massive increase in the amount of porn that makes fun of anti-porn politicians.
Anonymity is responsible for most of the good that the internet has done; letting marginalized groups get organized, for example.
Around half of the toxic people on Twitter (and the majority of the actually-most-harmful ones) are using their real names anyway.
Even G1 characters aren't safe from being made blockier than their originals; look at Skullgrin.
It's obviously better than Bulkhead by a wide margin (except for the head), but that doesn't mean it doesn't have some of the same issues.
And the balance you correctly say they seem to be going...
At this rate I'm not sure these tweets will stay up long...
https://www.vice.com/en/article/dy79bx/twitters-new-head-of-trust-and-safety-offers-to-partner-with-controversial-anti-trafficking-group
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.