Just got done with episode 10, about halfway through season 1. So far, so good. It's still very episodic but I can see some overarching plot points creeping in and it's done a good job of giving some backstories to the main crew.
It's also a good example of how different the messages are in the writing. Or as I like to say "teaching, rather than preaching" in these episodes. At that time, and much before it, when modern issues were put at the forefront of episodes they were done in such a way to give people something to think about. These days you get more of a heavy handed "This is what you're supposed to think and if you don't then you're one of the bad guys!" mindsets.
In this episode, the wacky religious weirdos didn't want to let the doctor operate on their kid because their "beliefs" dictated that his soul would shoot out of his body if it got cut open. The doctor thought they were idiots and wanted to save the kid, it was brought to the commander but instead of instantly siding with the doctor he sided with the weirdos because he says whether he believes it or not it's not his place, or the overall space station's place, to dictate otherwise, no matter how bad of an idea it might seem.
I feel like to that point, you wouldn't see that in a modern telling of that story, but it didn't end there - the doctor decided that he was just going to do it anyway and save the kid's life. So he went against their wishes and performed the operation. The boy lived and again, if today's story had gotten that far that seems like it would have been the end of it.
But no, it went even further where the parents believed their son was already dead and the body no longer had a soul so they put it out of its misery and killed their own son. That was tragic and preventable and despite doing the right (in our mind) thing, the doctor still wound up making things worse. Anyway, it just seems a lot less clear cut compared to how things are done now, and it's a very timeless narrative in our society. Especially when you see how it mirrors, to some degree, the faith healing nonsense and anti-vax stuff.
The main difference between that portrayal and the kinds of portrayals we see today is that in that case, as a viewer, you were presented with both points of view and had to draw your own conclusions instead of actively making the religious parents seem like the "bad guys". Even if you didn't agree with them, you at least got a chance to understand why they felt they were right and truly believed in what they were doing was in their son's best interest.
Anyway, on to the next.