Except that term isn't universally accepted due to bias.There is: proselytizing.
Except that term isn't universally accepted due to bias.There is: proselytizing.
As far as I was told, Christians were instructed via the Bible, etc, to live their lives according to their principals and to tell the world about Jesus. The "converting" part is up to the individual. It might seem like splitting hairs but I believe it's a significant difference myself.Seems like the only difference is that evangelizing is an attempt to convert someone to Christianity specifically.
SEVERAL biological processes do seem to have a quantum component to them, but given the tiny scale of cell parts, that just goes with the territory. It doesn't mean that consciousness itself is a quantum property. Heck the flash memory used in SSD's and SD cards relies on quantum effects to work(quantum tunneling specifically), having one installed on your computer doesn't turn it into a quantum computer.
There is a related school of thought that says there's just not enough space in our brains to hold all our memories.
That's news to me. Whose bias?Except that term isn't universally accepted due to bias.
I'm going by the Oxford Dictionary's definitions.As far as I was told, Christians were instructed via the Bible, etc, to live their lives according to their principals and to tell the world about Jesus. The "converting" part is up to the individual. It might seem like splitting hairs but I believe it's a significant difference myself.
That's news to me. Whose bias?
I'm going by the Oxford Dictionary's definitions.
"...Some draw distinctions between evangelism (or da‘wah in Islamic terminology) and proselytism, regarding proselytism as involuntary or coerced; the two terms can also be understood to merely be synonyms...
...The World Council of Churches has indicated that, when used pejoratively, proselytism refers to attempts at conversion by "unjust means that violate the conscience of the human person", such as by coercion or bribery..."
So he both was and wasn't.Heisenberg was Christian, yes, but Jewish enough that the Nazis still saw him as a Jew.
I still remember the day I realized what an unserious philosophy Christianity is.
I was in university and I was taking philosophy courses where we read about the writings of philosophers who ask interesting questions like "if you were a brain in a box being fed stimuli, how would you know", and then I sat in a cafeteria at a Christian college with a bunch of students who were asking questions like "what do you think you'll be wearing in Heaven".
They concluded that you would be wearing the most expensive and stylish clothes you'd ever worn in your life, and you would look the hottest you ever did in your life, like on your wedding day. And ... well, that was the day I realized what an unserious philosophy Christianity is.
These were smart, well-read Christian university students, many of whom had some formal theology training, and their idea of Heaven was a place where they'd get to keep the trappings of their socio-economic class here on Earth. In their Heaven, poor people would still be poor. Of course, they didn't realize that this is what they were saying, which is part of how you know their religion was a totally unserious philosophy. They just didn't think it through.
PS. Yes, I am aware that there are Christians who would never say something so shallow. But ... be honest: what percentage of global Christianity do you think falls into this category? And what would constitute a good answer to that question? Is everyone naked in Heaven? Does everyone wear standardized clothes, like in a prison?
Corollary to my previous rumination: I am no great philosopher. I took only one philosophy course in university. But one thing I do know about philosophy is that a philosopher will never avoid a question by complaining that it's an unfair "gotcha" question.
The whole point of Socratic interrogation is to ruthlessly pick apart a philosophical argument with hostile questions until it either falls apart or demonstrates its worth by surviving the challenge.
In philosophy, "gotcha" questions are the only kind of question worth asking.
I'm not sure what the point was. If someone gave up on any religion due to hearing such a conversation, then they haven't really invested much time to understanding the core values of that religion.FB friend: