Porn is never not a growth industry.
Porn is never not a growth industry.
Apparently Musk's great plan is to charge blue check mark people $20 a month to keep their blue check mark. I think two years is optimistic.
Twitter is planning to start charging soon for verification
“The whole verification process is being revamped right now,” Musk tweeted.www.theverge.com
Once upon a time, there were actually other websites on the internet besides Twitter, many of which were specifically designed to be used for this very thing.It has its actual uses though, DESPITE its own attempts to kill them off. *looks at all the artists who somehow manage to get an audience and sell commissions, while fighting the algorythm the entire time* Hell, there's quite a few artists I'd never have found(and commissioned) if it hadn't been for Twitter.
Oh, I'm well aware of that, and I hate it. Like, I guess we've reached the point where the majority of internet users literally grew up in the age of smartphones and apps, signed up for Twitter when they were seven, and have never had any reason to venture outside of that corner of the internet. The thought of even signing up for another website must seem like moving to Australia to them. But there are plenty of Twitter-exclusive artists who don't have that excuse—they used to post other places and then just... stopped. Forcing me to choose between spending a good chunk of my day using and passively supporting the Garbage Dump—and risking contracting whatever brain disease the rest of them have—or losing track of my favorite creators.There still are - I never said I only use Twitter for that. But there are artists where that is their site, like some who only use FurAffinity, or some who only use DeviantArt. We don't say the same thing of those sites. There's even a new one launching now, Inkblot. But I'd say the same thing if FA or DA was going down the tubes - they have their uses, and cheering them going under does ignore the legitimate uses of said site.
I would bet money that Elon Musk is screwing with peoples' Twitter accounts who he doesn't like, but not by outright blocking them. He seems like the kind of asshole who would turn it off and then on again or turn certain features off and then on again, so your account becomes a huge pain in the ass to use but when you complain, he can say "What? You weren't blocked. Look, your account works just fine".
Is it possible to kill a conspiracy theory?
Unlike scientific theories, conspiracy theories seem immune to disproof by evidence, or by newer and better ideas.
I can only think of a few conspiracy theories that have ever died: the one about Hitler secretly being alive and in Argentina, and the 200mpg carburetor. But those are special cases: Hitler would be 133 years old now so obviously nobody thinks he's alive anymore, secretly or not. And the carburetor is obsolete technology.
Is it possible to kill a conspiracy theory if it isn't based on something that naturally expires over time, like the lifespan of its subject or a piece of technology that goes obsolete?