Actually it doesn't. The President has the right to deploy troops to fight wherever the hell he wants for up to 90 days without Congressional approval. It's how we ended up in Iraq. TWICE
Actually it doesn't. The President has the right to deploy troops to fight wherever the hell he wants for up to 90 days without Congressional approval. It's how we ended up in Iraq. TWICE
Yeah, nukes are for two purposes: deterrence and spite.Never happen. Putin even vaguely gesturing toward the nukes is only part of the psychological warfare suite which is failing to work. He can't nuke ukraine without poisoning russia itself (environmentally AND politically.), and because it fails basic premise: putin WANTS ukraine. And putin can't nuke anyone else without dragging russia into a war they cannot win, and will likely lose inside an hour (once the other world powers deploy.) given how quickly their economy and war machine are already failing.
Putin is this for legacy: he wants to be written into the history books as the man that restored russia to the level of the soviet union, a world power. He launches a nuke and before his bird even lands (if it even lands. Missile defence is still a thing.), russia stops writing history. Propaganda and empty threats are all they have left in their conventional arsenal.
I keep hearing that putins "freedom convoy" has stalled, can anyone confirm?
Ok yeah I think it's time to investigate Faux Noise's ties to Russia.
Never mind Lincoln; the Republicans ain't even the party of Tom Clancy anymore.