On the removal of Star Trek: Discovery from Netflix abroad:
Announcing that you're pulling a show off the international version of the streaming service you've used to deliver it to consumers for the past 3 seasons about 2 days before they'd have settled in to start watching is a pro-league dick-move. The other shoe drops when you mention that your own streaming service won't be available in those markets for months.
Way to go, Paramount.
Ease of use doesn't make cheap assholes decide that they aren't entitled to a luxury. Can't afford/don't want to spend $10 a month for the service? Then don't watch the ******* show, you're not owed it.The only way to defeat piracy is ease of use.
We're also not owed artificial scarcity. There's exactly NO reason to not put any given show on literally every streaming service everywhere, or region locking them. It's the 21st century with a global spanning, instant communication network, not the 1960's.Ease of use doesn't make cheap assholes decide that they aren't entitled to a luxury. Can't afford/don't want to spend $10 a month for the service? Then don't watch the ******* show, you're not owed it.
You could always NOT watch the shows and not pay?The problem isn't that people aren't willing to pay $10 a month each for a service or two, it's that it's now $10 each for ten or twenty services, each of which offer less than before. Paramount isn't launching P+ because it's the only way for them to get their programming to the world, they're doing it because they don't want to share, because sharing is anathema to corporate shareholders.
And they could always NOT create yet another streaming service with limited content, and use the other, more established with more content, services to allow access to their content.You could always NOT watch the shows and not pay?
You could always NOT watch the shows and not pay?
Ease of use doesn't make cheap assholes decide that they aren't entitled to a luxury. Can't afford/don't want to spend $10 a month for the service? Then don't watch the ******* show, you're not owed it.
Hell, why they didn't just make it free/supported by advertising in the first place boggles my mind. I know folks are spoiled by services like prime and netflix with ad free content: but most are more willing to sit through commercials than they are to pay another monthly.
Then you're cheap. And a thief. And you can thank me and everyone else morally superior to you for subsidizing your entertainment.And then $10 for this service, and another $12 for that one. And just $10 more each for these other two. Before you know it you're back up to the price of a regular cable subscription. Except these days, food costs 15% more and renting a bachelor in a slum is $2500/month.
No thanks. I'm anything but cheap, and I happily buy shows that I've obtained via alternative means on blu-ray once they're released on the format, but $*#@ all these different streaming services, and doubly *$#& anyone who tells me I can't do as I damn well please.
Then you're cheap. And a thief. And you can thank me and everyone else morally superior to you for subsidizing your entertainment.
Do you also decide whatever foods you think look tasty at the grocery store are free samples, eat whatever you please, and then justify it by buying things later, thief?I own all three seasons of Discovery as well as the first seasons of Picard and Lower Decks on blu-ray. Altogether they probably cost around $160, enough for 15 years of access to CBS All Access, Paramount+, or whatever it's called these days.... a period of time that'll likely end up being double the span of time their streaming services manages to stick around.
Paramount should thank me for not wasting their server's bandwidth, and you can take your opinion and attitude and get lost. Morally superior my ass; you're nothing but a malcontent and an agitator. Piss off.
Do you also decide whatever foods you think look tasty at the grocery store are free samples, eat whatever you please, and then justify it by buying things later, thief?
Tilly's still terrible in Kobayashi Maru, being fat is the least of her problems. I can tell you this because I paid to watch the episode.I'm really not interested in morality lessons from someone whose repeatedly proven himself to be an unsympathetic sack of s*$% when it comes to actual people, but will gladly defend the rights of billion dollar corporations. As long as your posts get a rise out of someone, isn't that right?
Fat shame any other actresses lately, or are you still mostly focused on your Tilly-hating? You're as worthless as your opinions.
Hell, why they didn't just make it free/supported by advertising in the first place boggles my mind. I know folks are spoiled by services like prime and netflix with ad free content: but most are more willing to sit through commercials than they are to pay another monthly.
No, you really do not understand how a business can succeed at mathematical psychology. Studies have shown piracy rarely if ever a killing factor for any given production.Ease of use doesn't make cheap assholes decide that they aren't entitled to a luxury. Can't afford/don't want to spend $10 a month for the service? Then don't watch the ******* show, you're not owed it.
Uh, why are you even here if you advocate for someone not to peruse the content in the title?You could always NOT watch the shows and not pay?
Unless you're talking about old video games, in which case having even the slightest interest in ease of use means you need to be condescended to by a hundred Raspberry Pi bros.The only way to defeat piracy is ease of use.