Re: How does Soong have descendants?
He works in genetics.
He works in genetics.
I like how at the end of the first season we could say "we'll see if that has any meaningful impact on the story in the future", and we still can.
Yeah, in theory it's quite a missed opportunity.I know Picard Season 1 didn't know during the writing phase they'd be getting a Season 2, but with Q in this season it makes it absolutely daft they didn't resolve Picard's illness in THIS season as opposed to the last with Q's parting gift not being just resurrecting the dead but curing Picard.
No Synth nonsense and we'd have a bit of a more interesting romp in the past with Picard's health continuing to decline and the complications that brings to the story.
Well, the mystery plot wasn't spoonfed to us, and it had a resolution. That there puts it ahead of anything former critical darling J.J. Abrams would have given us.Q screwed around with 2024 and made a dystopian present in order to help Picard deal with a trauma that happened in the early 2300s?
Do the writers need to be drug tested?
You just never really know, but having a plan I have learned -- in some cases the hard way -- is the most critical thing, because otherwise you don't know what you're setting up.
Figure out the end earlier. If you’re going to do a serialized show, you have the whole story before you start shooting. It’s more like a movie in that way — you better know the end of your third act before you start filming your first scene.
So I watched Jessie Gender's review of Season 2, and it's a good and insightful review that has much more productive things to say about the show than I do. It's a very fair autopsy. But I'm bringing it up now for a petty and superficial reason, because a particular interview came up that bears on the JJ Abrams comparison.
You know that thing that JJ Abrams hilariously "learned" from his treatment of Star Wars?
Guess what Akiva Goldsman said he learned from the first season of Picard, that Season 2 would improve on.
I could be crazy here, but I'm thinking that if the two of them each invented the concept of outlining for the first time in human history at around the same time, Abrams might have been able to pull off an equally satisfying mystery. It's not a high bar.
I've seen the modern era referred to elsewhere as the Secret Hideout era (based on the production company Kurtzman founded in 2014). The Abramsverse is in its own weird little pocket dimension, not really fitting in with either era, but with clear stylistic ties to both.I call that era Berman Trek for convenience, despite it starting with TNG firmly under Roddenberry's direction. It technically overlaps by a few years with the TOS movies, and conveniently does not overlap at all with the Kelvin movies and Paramount streaming series, which I'd collectively call Kurtzman Trek despite his only being a writer on Trek 2009 itself, again for convenience.
Wow. How bad at your job do you need to be to both need to have this revelation and then say it out loud?"Figure out the end before you start the beginning..."
Doctor Picard and his timeship?It's interesting because Q could have done something that the android body could have easily done - make him a younger healthy version of himself that could have been recast and the character continue.