As much as I loved the Titan returning the favour and tossing that rock at the Shrike, I'm pretty sure they didn't know that the portal weapon wasn't in play anymore, and the last head on attack went catastrophically badly.
I didn't even think about it when I was watching. ButAs much as I loved the Titan returning the favour and tossing that rock at the Shrike, I'm pretty sure they didn't know that the portal weapon wasn't in play anymore, and the last head on attack went catastrophically badly.
"Selective observation" is a hallmark of Star Trek. How did any number of people on board not think, "Hmm, I wonder if there's a pattern to these regular pulses of energy?"
Memory Alpha has some confusing dates. Like saying that Picard had been aboard the Star Gazer for 9 years before Beverly even entered Star Fleet Academy. How much older were Jack and Picard?
I have a feeling that the wiki might need some updating after this series is over to tie everything together.Do you remember in Nemesis, when Beverly and Picard are in his ready room, and they reminisce over a picture over him at the Academy, with Beverly saying she remembered him? Well, she couldn't have, since she was somewhere between Not Even Born and three years old when that picture would have been taken.
This is the first actual reference to Jack's age too, previously all we knew was when he got married, had a son, and died. For what it's worth, the actor who played Jack in the recording made before his death was 30 at the time, which would make him contemporary of Beverly, rather than Picard. In fact, it's implied in Attached that the two were already married before either met Picard.
If my memory serves, Picard didn't have to find Guinan's bar in the 25th century. He had to find where it was in the 21st century, though.Though Picard itself can't keep to its own continuity; stardates and official statements suggest that we're in 2401, which means "five years ago" would've been during Picard's hermitage (when he would hardly have been waxing nostalgic about Starfleet adventures to a bunch of cadets, in a bar that he didn't even find until last season), and that Jack would've been born before Nemesis.
Why do I feel like I remember that Picard introduced Jack to Beverly?Do you remember in Nemesis, when Beverly and Picard are in his ready room, and they reminisce over a picture over him at the Academy, with Beverly saying she remembered him? Well, she couldn't have, since she was somewhere between Not Even Born and three years old when that picture would have been taken.
This is the first actual reference to Jack's age too, previously all we knew was when he got married, had a son, and died. For what it's worth, the actor who played Jack in the recording made before his death was 30 at the time, which would make him contemporary of Beverly, rather than Picard. In fact, it's implied in Attached that the two were already married before either met Picard.
I don't know. I feel it too. I don't know if I made it all up, but my impression has been that Jack served under Picard on the Stargazer and was killed doing something Picard sent him to do and he felt guilt for it. If all I thought I knew about him is true, they actually stole something from Jack when they said they were Academy buddies. If he was 20 years younger, THAT Jack Crusher was a shining star that Picard was developing but was cut short before he fulfilled his promise. If they were Academy buddies, Jean-Luc was a shining star going places and Jack was a junior officer that didn't take off. He was just a hopefully competent (though some evidence against that?) friend that Picard brought along because he liked him.Why do I feel like I remember that Picard introduced Jack to Beverly?
To be fair, he said organized crime is logical when crime is inevitable. It wasn't a complete tautology."Utopia cannot exist without a criminal element. Ergo, it is logical" is a stupid, stupid line put in the mouth of someone who should be intelligent. That means the writers failed. It seems to have been meant seriously. But it is stupid.
Another stupid line:"Is it a new species?" "No. It's evolution." On a couple levels.
1) These Changelings look totally different when changing than the Founders and are now found to be doing a better and different job of mimicking than the Founders. The Founders weren't the first shapeshifters in Star Trek. At least 2 preceded. Now, I guess I COULD assume that some scan has demonstrated that they ARE Founders, but dialogue hasn't said so and I don't trust modern Star Trek producers to decide that it wouldn't make sense for them not to do some scan that would demonstrate it. Remember last week when Crusher saved the day because she was the only one looking for a pattern in the deadly energy pulses? Now, I am sure that the intent and conclusion of the show is that they ARE, in fact, Founders. But the show itself has not demonstrated to me any reason to assume they are. The evidence is largely that it IS a new species.
2) If it is literally evolution (and it sure feels like a writer that doesn't understand is giving us a 25th century medical doctor who doesn't understand any better than they do), then the answer is "Yes. It's evolution"
3) But it isn't evolution. It is advanced technique.
Beverly had just asked Jack how he knew those were all Changelings. I would be willing to be 40 cents that he will say, "I didn't"
To be fair, he said organized crime is logical when crime is inevitable. It wasn't a complete tautology.
Thing is, part of the reason we as the audience know for sure is the pot Seven found. It's possible that Crusher knows about it as well.[/spoiler]