For the record, I'd like to use this post-covid brain fog as to why I didn't logic that out properly, but I figure regular me would have still done it.
I don't think you understood his line of logic (it's possible that *I'm* the one misunderstanding, but bear with me).You're correct. And if this was in the Kelvin timeline that would be applicable. But since this is the "prime" timeline Kirk wouldn't have been born in space because that was the divergance as you said.
In Star Trek IV Kirk said he was from Iowa.
They never mentioned anything in the relaunch trilogy about this.
All we can go by is what happened in Star Trek TOS unless it becomes official in the new time line.
I mean, meeting new worlds and places get "trickier" when its a prequel. That in and of itself can make weird situations.
I wish the klingons gear looked more tos is all.
My take on this is that the attack on the Kelvin makes his mom have an early birth. Think about it, his parents haven't even decided on a name yet. If not for the attack, the Kelvin would have made it back home and James T Kirk would have been born in Riverside, Iowa like he said in ST4. Now you could say that maybe Kirk claims he is from riverside, Iowa because he grew up there, but he wasn't as his family left and moved to the colony Tarsus IV, where they were some of the few to survive there.I don't think you understood his line of logic (it's possible that *I'm* the one misunderstanding, but bear with me).
In the Kelvin timeline, Kirk was born JUST after the point of divergence.
If we assume that everything prior to that divergence point was the same, then we have to assume that Kirk's mother was REALLY close to giving birth in space in the Prime universe. It's still possible that the trauma of the Narada attack didn't trigger an early birth, but the set-up there still makes it implausible that she'd get to Earth before giving birth (Kirk's comments in ST4 notwithstanding).
All that said, I think the Kelvin timeline diverges in ways that aren't well-explained by assuming everything pre-Narada was the same, but canon since the 2009 movie has thus far tended to reinforce the "everything prior was the same" argument as opposed to my own.
Just to be clear, I think it's pretty much stated straight out that the attack on the Kelvin makes Kirk's mom have an early birth. I'm not disputing that (with the caveat that I allowed some "possibility" to the contrary). My only real suggestion is that I don't think it's likely, given the pre-attack state of things, that Kirk's mom was going to be able to get to Earth before Kirk would have been born.My take on this is that the attack on the Kelvin makes his mom have an early birth. Think about it, his parents haven't even decided on a name yet. If not for the attack, the Kelvin would have made it back home and James T Kirk would have been born in Riverside, Iowa like he said in ST4. Now you could say that maybe Kirk claims he is from riverside, Iowa because he grew up there, but he wasn't as his family left and moved to the colony Tarsus IV, where they were some of the few to survive there.
Well, we don't know how early the baby was born. Now, babies can be viable if born months early. Imagine what they could do in the 23rd century. If Kirk was born a month early due to stress, then that would be plenty of time for the Kelvin to get back to Earth.Just to be clear, I think it's pretty much stated straight out that the attack on the Kelvin makes Kirk's mom have an early birth. I'm not disputing that (with the caveat that I allowed some "possibility" to the contrary). My only real suggestion is that I don't think it's likely, given the pre-attack state of things, that Kirk's mom was going to be able to get to Earth before Kirk would have been born.
But, as someone else has pointed out. The only previous Prime universe canon on the matter is that Kirk was "from" Iowa, not that he was actually "born" there. There's some wiggle room on this yet.