Apparently the bunnies thing was also a Buffy musical referance, I was hearing?
Yeah, that could be the case. Anya was a bit paranoid when it came to bunnies, and it came out in song during Buffy's musical.
Apparently the bunnies thing was also a Buffy musical referance, I was hearing?
I was waiting for that shoe to drop as soon as they realized the singing was making them communicate their feelings. Their entire reason for interacting with the subspace fold was to use it for communication. The turn that it was trying to help them communicate all along seemed obvious.Honestly, I feel like it would've worked better with a random god-like alien behind it all, even if that particular plot mechanism has been done to death in other musical episodes (Buffy, The Flash, and sort of in The Brave and the Bold). I mean, it's Star Trek; god-like aliens putting the crew in silly situations is almost routine.
Depends on what it was structurally meant to do, which the episode as aired has mixed feelings on. We're in engineering where the problem solving is happening, and by the end of this chunk of song Uhura is going to solve the problem. Before they get to that solution, Spock and Uhura need to sing about being alone, which is and isn't answered by the ultimate reveal of the solution. I don't honestly see a reason to have made these separate songs in the first place.(I would also criticize putting Spock's number and Uhura's number back-to-back on the same set. There should've been a scene change or a location shift between them.)
Are we, man? Are we overemphasizing the things that happened in the episode to the detriment of things that didn't? Am I overlooking all the things the writers were definitely probably maybe thinking about at some point, but ultimately decided not to bring up?People are focusing too much on the fact of singing, when we know Klingons sing a lot.
It's been twenty-odd years, but my wife and I will still bust out "must be bunnies" when we need an unknown something to cast blame upon.Anya was a bit paranoid when it came to bunnies, and it came out in song during Buffy's musical.
You may snark, but that's why I specifically called it out as a No-Prize explanation - remember how that used to be a thing, where someone would write into the letters page with a valid explanation for a otherwise plothole, and that was basically the response? Mostly Marvel stuff(including Transformers I think?) but still. Just like those instances, it's probably not something the authors thought of, but it fits in the hole as good as a lego brick clicking into place.Maybe you and DVD can get together and write that episode!
Taking a walk and got to really picturing this.Honestly, I feel like it would've worked better with a random god-like alien behind it all, even if that particular plot mechanism has been done to death in other musical episodes (Buffy, The Flash, and sort of in The Brave and the Bold). I mean, it's Star Trek; god-like aliens putting the crew in silly situations is almost routine.
We watched 4 episodes last season and then it was never what my wife wanted to watch, when we sat down. I waited. But I am on a two week staycation and I'm getting caught up.
The storybook episode wasn't fun for me. They wind up making it very consequential at the end, but if it doesn't come to more eventually it felt like a pretty unsatisfying ending to a story arc. I haven't seen the "Balance of Terror" redo yet or the musical episode, but it sure seems like this show is awfully interested in doing event episodes.
For me it was Sir Ortegas. Delightful to see the cast playing unexpected characters in any case, though. And a much better device for it than the old crutch of Mirror, Mirror episodes, I don't actually need to know "what if" every member of the cast was evil and bisexual.The Storybook episode had Princess La'an though, so the entire episode gets a pass from me.
It is at that. The best episode this season so far IMO is the story of a redshirt from a specific mission referenced in TOS and features a location where they turned the camera slightly to show the giant castle tower that was just out of frame in 1965. With just ten episodes to work with per season and the doctrine that every episode has to largely stand on its own, even ordinary episodes can feel a bit like "Trials and Tribble-ations". That gives it the ability to pull off episodes like the Lower Decks crossover that have left me giggling in delight through the entire runtime thanks to the sheer density of delightfully clever touches. But I don't think 18 episodes is enough groundwork to float a musical episode, which itself was kind of a mess and didn't seem to bring in the professionals required to pull it off.I haven't seen the "Balance of Terror" redo yet or the musical episode, but it sure seems like this show is awfully interested in doing event episodes.
You are literally the only person I've seen make that accusation. Tastes can differ, and if you didn't like it, you didn't like it. But when the cast includes multiple members with Broadway musical experience, including one who won a Grammy (and was also nominated for a Tony), accusing them of not bringing in the professionals required to pull it off sounds more than a little insulting.But I don't think 18 episodes is enough groundwork to float a musical episode, which itself was kind of a mess and didn't seem to bring in the professionals required to pull it off.
They did that already with Guy Fleegman - er, Sam Kirk - referring to him by last name only until he shows up and you find out it isn't Jim.That said, once I heard the accent I was so hoping they’d keep it to “Mr Scott” and go through only for him to be killed and with his dying breath to ask them to tell his Brother “Montgomery” he’s sorry (or something) just to get a little surprise/variety in there.