No, but at the same time how often does this come up in fiction?For what "we" call "pieces of media", the names they are released under are mostly sufficient (only "mostly" and not entirely because of the fact that the same titles get used more than once).
But no character (except maybe fourth-wall-breaking ones) would or should say "the universe of the Cyberverse cartoon".
FP's own TransTech stuff was pretty niche and most mainstream Transformers stories tend to stay clear of universe hopping.
Hasbro clearly sees value in some FP ideas- Shattered Glass for one- and given that the gimmick of that line was "mirror universe" it might have been a good opportunity to talk about universal streams and clusters but they didn't.
Then Hasbro did Legacy- all about characters from across the multiverse converging- an even better excuse to pull it out. And they didn't.
Hell, you know what they call the home universes of the characters on Legacy packaging? The normal terms. "G1 Universe," "Armada Universe," "Animated Universe," etc...
This was the perfect time for Hasbro to resurrect the clusters and streams and they didn't because they probably don't see the value in complicating the matter with pseudo Latin techno babble.
I don't know what characters would refer to their universes or others' universes in the fiction sans the cluster/stream system. I really don't, but I also don't think it matters nearly enough to Weekend at Bernie's the system past its death date either.