I suppose that's largely dependent on how you feel about exploding rockets.Elon is CEO of SpaceX and owns 42% of the company, but I don't think there is really much complaint about how that company is running, right?
I suppose that's largely dependent on how you feel about exploding rockets.Elon is CEO of SpaceX and owns 42% of the company, but I don't think there is really much complaint about how that company is running, right?
I feel terrible about them when they are actual missions with crew. When it is a test flight for new technologies, I understand that it is par for the course. This is when you are supposed to find out what does and doesn't work, Boeing.I suppose that's largely dependent on how you feel about exploding rockets.
FUN FACT! Almost all of Elon's "wealth" is tied up in Tesla. The more the company and stock tanks, the more his net worth drops. Yeah, he might be CEO and owner of 6 or 7 businesses but only one of those is designed to make money. Here's a hint, it's the one that's being targeted by protesters right now.I think you are really only talking about Tesla. Tesla is having some trouble and Musk is the CEO and 12% owner. Honestly, I think it would be to his own advantage right now to get a new CEO and place and possibly divest.
Yes, if I were a CEO, I would be extremely ticked at him right now. After all the work I put in trying to make it look like I do 1000 times more work than everyone else.CEO of three companies and running doge. Kinda shows how much work he actually does as a CEO, doesn't it.
Booting him won't suddenly relieve him of his shares. If he points anything their way, he'd be ******* himself over. Even more than he already is.The problem is that if they boot Musk, they know the vindictive little prick will point DOGE at them next. And I highly doubt any of them have skeleton-free closets. So, which is worth more to them?
If you'd asked that just a few years ago, I'd say there really wasn't any. Nowadays, there are several options. Some of the mainstream brands, and several newer ones. None as firmly established (at least, in the specific electric car market) as Tesla, perhaps, but perfectly ready to rise up and take its place in a time like this.Who is the real competition with the progressives who still want an electric car?
How is it not clearly human error, whether error in judgment or careless typing?Well that lasted all of a day.
View attachment 27104
Yes, let's go to Musk instead of someone like Mandiant whose entire job is digital forensics for this sort of thing, if it even was anything other than someone mistaking one person's profile for another. Musk apparently has a hate-on for Signal too, so he'll probably throw out bad info on that, spin some excuse to try to get the staffers out of it, then push them all to Telegram(where everything is logged on the Telegram servers anyways for group chats - but look! Stickers!).
Theoretically, it is possible that someone phished Waltz, linked their device to his Signal account, then used that to join JG to the conversation (or at least his contact list). Of course, that's even worse(as said unknown also had all of Waltz's Signal data then), so if that were the case I wouldn't expect them to admit to it either. Is it likely? Simply not bothering to properly check the participants is more likely, but it is indeed a possibility. Especially since if someone DID compromise his Signal account they just burned their access, but who knows what else such a person may have gotten already - if that had happened of course.How is it not clearly human error, whether error in judgment or careless typing?