The US Supreme Court and its decisions
- Thread starter Patch
- Start date
I would say that it's not the Bible, but rather interpretations of it. Regardless, there will always be cases where even a "perfect" example of a (Christian) will be at odds with the standards of "the world".
Last edited:
FB friend:
Because to those people: apologizing is for the weak. You aren't the pinnacle of your culture and society if you aren't outright and shamelessly exploiting everyone and everything around for your own gain. Racism isn't wrong: it's literally just eliminating competition for scarce resources. Admitting you have a problem, then trying to atone for it: well, that's for democrats and beta cucks.
Because to many, an apology implies guilt. And after having been told all their lives that the sun rises and sets in their own pants, they are unwilling to take even the little bit of implied guilt that comes along with an apology.
FB friend:
Really? The Supreme Court is considering a precedent which would allow companies to sue workers for "economic damage" when the workers go on strike?
This truly is the shittiest timeline. But, you know ... her E-mails.
Why going on strike could get much harder for American workers
Supreme Court will hear a case that could let employers sue workers for economic damage during strikes.www.cbsnews.com
Trump judge ends Biden's LGBTQ anti-discrimination protections for health care - LGBTQ Nation
The lawsuit was brought by two doctors who wanted to discriminate against LGBTQ patients.
www.lgbtqnation.com
Well then. Let's see how far this SCOTUS wants to go in terms of placing itself on the wrong side of history.
Alito and the other extremists are smart enough to understand their place in history. The moment they leave their precedents will be overturned yet again. All they've done is buy their particular brand of extremists a decade or two at the price of lives they consider unimportant. They'll go to their grave knowing that, happy that they did good work.
Alito and the other extremists are smart enough to understand their place in history. The moment they leave their precedents will be overturned yet again. All they've done is buy their particular brand of extremists a decade or two at the price of lives they consider unimportant. They'll go to their grave knowing that, happy that they did good work.
U.S. Supreme Court leans toward web designer with anti-gay marriage stance
The U.S. Supreme Court's conservative majority on Monday appeared ready to rule that a Christian web designer has a right to refuse to provide services for same-sex marriages in a case the liberal justices said could empower certain businesses to discriminate based on constitutional free speech...
The death of Obergefell is not an "if," it's a WHEN.
Good thread:
Previous Supreme Courts would have used "lack of standing" as a reason to not even hear this case.
And for those who didn't hear about it, while hearing arguments today Justice Alito decided it was a good time to make a joke about black children in KKK uniforms and imply that a fellow sitting justice is having an affair using popular website "Ashley Madison".
Stay classy.
Stay classy.
Well they're talking on that NC redistricting case now. I'm actually mildly surprised that Kavanaugh and Barrett are waffling on it... here's hoping that they stay that way.
www.politico.com
Supreme Court seems poised to reject robust reading of ‘independent state legislature’ theory
John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Barrett are the key justices to watch in a case that could allow state legislatures to bypass courts on election rules.
www.politico.com