...and there's no more important safety rule than to wear these: <taps> safety glasses.Sometimes glasses help!
...and there's no more important safety rule than to wear these: <taps> safety glasses.Sometimes glasses help!
That would be WHY it didn't blind me!Sometimes glasses help!
Which I think is part of the reason we've seen so little on the "revisit" front. There's just too many gimmicks that would impact Hasbro's ability to retool and resell the molds. Double so for the Autobots, whose combining is, I don't feel, feasible with the current line and budget structures of the brand in the Generations segment.Combining, Energon Stars, Hyper Modes, Energon Weapons, Brute Modes, the line was chock full of fun gimmicks.
I do find it odd that some segments of the Transformers fandom these days are trying to push the notion that kids don't care about articulation.
I mean... when I was a kid... I definitely noticed when my toys couldn't move like I wanted them to.
And for the record, I was primarily being a sarcastic ass because the collector mentality HAS pushed "fun" out a LOT of toy lines, not just Transformers. Either through the demand for "MORE (...at lower prices)", or insisting every toy must be a complex puzzle or be loaded with over a dozen points of articulation.And yeah, I dispute the supposed lack of appeal for articulation, and frankly suspect the claim comes from a false dilemma. I can see kids not specifically needing their toys to have ankle tilts or an crunches or finger articulation that only ever leads to one thing anyway, but there's a reason articulation became such a premium until it became a standard across numerous action figure genres: a generation of kids grew up wanting their toys to have more of it. I don't think the pendulum has swung the other way and that kids now prefer bricks.
Sure, but I'd wager we are all.Me? I was a character driven consumer. Did I want my Batman figures to move like GI Joe? Sure, but I was a Batman fan and that's what I had.
I loved my G2 Prime and Starscream, because of the characters.Similarly, my most played with Transformers were the Powermaster Optimus Prime and Pretender Legends because of the CHARACTERS, not whether they had articulation or not.
This is nothing new. I have the two Brave MPs Takara did and they're annoyingly complex compared to what they have to do, for the sake of feeling like "premium" items. And these figures are what? 20-25 years old?...because the collector mentality HAS pushed "fun" out a LOT of toy lines, not just Transformers. Either through the demand for "MORE (...at lower prices)", or insisting every toy must be a complex puzzle or be loaded with over a dozen points of articulation.
This is nothing new. I have the two Brave MPs Takara did and they're annoyingly complex compared to what they have to do, for the sake of feeling like "premium" items. And these figures are what? 20-25 years old?
But mostly when I see the "fun" zapped out of toylines it's in stuff like Star Wars Black Series where Imperial Diplomat #2638 or Republic Senator #6302 are clogging up shelves and pegs because kids don't want "old man in robe" quite like they want Darth Vader or Han Solo. To be perfectly honest I don't know very many adult collectors who want that either
But I digress.
My main point of contention is that it seems any time we get a UT character done in Generations there's always some nudnik who holds the original figure on some pedestal and laments that the new version lacking spring loaded gimmicks or electronics is some regrettable downgrade, and this is always paired with some snark about how increased articulation is Bad Actually
Nah. Sorry. F Armada Red Alert's woo woo woo. I didn't even like that as a teenager. The new version is more accurate to the animation model, is more articulate, and doesn't have that annoying electronic gimmick? I... don't see the issue.
The only Armada gimmicks I've absolutely missed are Starscream's wing sword and Megatron's hand knife. Every other omission is one I'm 100% fine with...
... and I don't think kids are gonna mind, either.
I'd rather get at least 2-packs like the Siege/Earthrise Micromasters. Make them versus sets like the Cybertron releases and release two teams that way.Shame they killed the Core class. That would've been a great way to get some Minicons made.
Main difference is that obscure transformers tend to be unique designs/colours (even if they're just straight repaints), while obscure/generic Star Wars characters are 90% just a boring human.I don't understand a lot about the Star Wars fandom, so I hesitate to comment on much about the toylines. But producing obscuros and generics is something I want Transformers to be able to do as well, so sometimes it's just the bullet that must be taken. Idk.
In Star Wars, that White Dude probably has a name, a backstory, and a major role somewhere in the Legacy novels. And somehow he's a Jedi despite them all being purged.Main difference is that obscure transformers tend to be unique designs/colours (even if they're just straight repaints), while obscure/generic Star Wars characters are 90% just a boring human.
If it was a cool-looking alien or droid, that'd be something, but no one's getting excited for Another White Dude In The Background.
I would be fine with a deluxe-size pack of 3-4 Minicons or a combination of Minicons and weapons if we never get a Core size class or equivalent again. Really wish Hasbro would lean into some kind of multipack of smaller figures to hit the existing price point rather than just not do smaller figures.I'd rather get at least 2-packs like the Siege/Earthrise Micromasters. Make them versus sets like the Cybertron releases and release two teams that way.
Didn't Evan say they were looking into ways to get some Minicons who were missed out there?Bare minimum: include the darn Mini-Con. Even if it doesn't activate a feature. The new Armada toys are objectively less fun without their little buddies.
I understand it fairly well. I'm married to a Stormtrooper/Imperial Black Series collector.I don't understand a lot about the Star Wars fandom, so I hesitate to comment on much about the toylines. But producing obscuros and generics is something I want Transformers to be able to do as well, so sometimes it's just the bullet that must be taken. Idk.
There absolutely is a market for that stuff. It's just that it's probably smaller than the production runs these things need. It seems like every Star Wars section of every Walmart and Target toy aisle I see is just generic background peeps in robes and non-descript military uniforms.I don't disagree with any of that. But me not understanding that fandom leaves me outside the space of whether or not there might actually be some interest or excitement from getting Rando Citezeann in his second Cloud City attire. There's absolutely none for me (and I'm right there with you and the others on that) but I'm content to chalk that up to me possibly just not getting it.
I get the desire for generic background nobodies.I just chuckle at not understanding the desire for background nobodies while we get stuff like Diaclone recolors or generic Seekers or guys who appeared in one or two issues of a comic back in the 80s. Their Rand'oum N'Boudi is our Straxus or Crosscut or Acid Storm.