Traitor Watch - The 45 & 47 Thread
- Thread starter Wheelimus
- Start date
I'll run out tomorrow morning before I go to bed (night shift guy, here), but in Oklahoma? My "blue vote" will probably be as effective as a squirt gun during a tornado.
I ain't about how effective your one vote is. It's about how many single votes that can snowball. I guarantee that you aren't the only one voting blue, and your district might surprise you still.
If he had done this a week ago, it would've been one of the most popular Halloween costumes this year.
I hope we see a lot of him dressed like that and picking up trash on the highway.
JD Vance is so far off the deep end that JOE ROGAN will call him out on his misogyny.
FB friend:
This comment will be harder for Mike Johnson to clean up.
And CNN is STILL soft handing it: trumps doesn't want to send her to war, trump wants to execute her. ******* cowards.
This is so stupid. Can we go back to the "concepts of a plan" thing? That was so much better than whatever this is.
No, he was not calling for the summary execution of Liz Cheney. He was rambling about chickenhawks maybe feeling differently if they had to go to war themselves. That's not spin his campaign came up with after the event. It is the immediate context of the ramble. The very next sentence out of his mouth was:
Good on CNN for quoting that part, I guess, but they should really note that it was the very next sentence after the one they're pretending not to understand.
20 years ago it would be a Democrat saying this (probably much more artfully), and it would be FOX having a cow saying "That's not patriotic!" What is happening?
No, he was not calling for the summary execution of Liz Cheney. He was rambling about chickenhawks maybe feeling differently if they had to go to war themselves. That's not spin his campaign came up with after the event. It is the immediate context of the ramble. The very next sentence out of his mouth was:
Good on CNN for quoting that part, I guess, but they should really note that it was the very next sentence after the one they're pretending not to understand.
20 years ago it would be a Democrat saying this (probably much more artfully), and it would be FOX having a cow saying "That's not patriotic!" What is happening?
imagine if this got like a tenth the coverage of Biden's asinine misspeaks.
www.thedailybeast.com
Jeffrey Epstein Showed Pics of Trump with Topless Young Women, Claims Author
Controversial writer Michael Wolff says Epstein kept the pics in his safe—which the FBI later seized.
He's using "fair" the way a five-year-old would, meaning "beneficial to me/us personally, the only people who matter as far as I'm concerned."
The Untold Story of Trump's Failed Attempt to Overthrow Venezuela's President
A successful CIA hack of Venezuela's military payroll system, insider fights for spy agency resources, and messy opposition politics: A WIRED investigation reveals a secret Trump-era attempt to oust autocratic ruler Nicolás Maduro.
..why are we learning about this just DAYS before he might be elected again?!
I wouldn't be screaming about that so fast. Yeah I know, don't believe polls but....
Ironbite-she's leading him in Iowa.
Iowa Poll: Kamala Harris leapfrogs Donald Trump to take lead near Election Day. Here's how
The new Iowa Poll shows Kamala Harris leading Donald Trump by 3 points. Pollster J. Ann Selzer: “It’s hard for anybody to say they saw this coming.”
www.desmoinesregister.com
Ironbite-she's leading him in Iowa.
Released the same day, so *shrug*
I could see the scenario the Selzer poll laying out being why Kamala wins driven by women, and I actually lean towards her winning because of it, but if she were kicking ass in Iowa of all places with such a dramatic swing towards the Dems wouldn't that momentum be reflected in her doing much better elsewhere? That'd mean she's running away with this thing.
Oh well, I take it all with a grain of salt especially with it only being a couple days before we find out anyway.
I could see the scenario the Selzer poll laying out being why Kamala wins driven by women, and I actually lean towards her winning because of it, but if she were kicking ass in Iowa of all places with such a dramatic swing towards the Dems wouldn't that momentum be reflected in her doing much better elsewhere? That'd mean she's running away with this thing.
Oh well, I take it all with a grain of salt especially with it only being a couple days before we find out anyway.
It would be a shock if Iowa is moving that much and only one pollster noticed, and neither campaign apparently noticed either.