It's been a while since I've seen a Retrax in person, but was he always that translucent? Or is that just an effect of the camera?
I was wondering that myself. I feel like the original toy had a darker green plastic that, while still clearly (ha!) translucent, was less obviously so? But it is very likely just the camera/lighting in those pics.It's been a while since I've seen a Retrax in person, but was he always that translucent? Or is that just an effect of the camera?
It's not so much a "problem" per se, but more like something one can do with the figure by choosing to not transform it correctly. When transformed properly, the bug leg is hidden beneath the robot mode's chestplate. But one could instead choose to not hide it away and just let it stick out from the figure's waist all phallic-like. By removing it, Hasbro is basically eliminating that option from being a potential possibility for someone to do with the figure altogether.I hate to be that guy, but this is the first I’ve heard of an unfortunate mid placement of one of his legs. Do photos exist of this…”problem”?
Aaaaand now I'm not getting it.
They reissued a toy nobody wanted, charged $25 for it, and left parts out.
That might be easily fixable, IIRC.Also, his antennae are on backward.
Oh my achin' head...So show accurate then?