AI don't trust techbros
- Thread starter NovaSaber
- Start date
Because Google's training data is probably the entire (search-engine-accesible part of) the internet, or at least a portion of it that includes the Onion, conspiracy sites, and Reddit shitposters named "fucksmith".
Google's AI Overview Is Spreading Conspiracies and Could Encourage Self-Harm
Why is Google's AI Overview search product spreading misinformation?
www.rollingstone.com
This is incredibly irresponsible. Just because it's popular doesn't mean it's the best.
I think you underestimate how much of Twitter is shitposting, conspiracy theories, and people who think they're the Onion. (I mean, hell, the sheer volume of disinformation on there is the whole reason the fact-check bot exists.)
It's not so much an AI as it is an almost infinite number of monkeys on word processors...
It's not wrong, that website does contain that fact. There's a great one with Cobra Commander also.
The first thing a non-skynet AI work force does is completely crash the economy. Robots don't need money or luxury goods or food: but they'll have all the jobs. The rest of us need food, clothes, housing and such: and will have no money. The rich don't spend their own money, so once peoples savings dry up: the economy craps out because there won't be any money to spend on the crap the robots are making.
U.S. record labels are suing AI music generators, alleging copyright infringement
Universal Music Group, Sony Music Entertainment and Warner Music Group, among others, filed lawsuits Monday against Suno and Udio-maker Uncharted Labs.
www.nbcnews.com
Let. Them. FIGHT.
Absolutely ******* not, no.
AI Firm ElevenLabs Sets Audio Reader Pact With Judy Garland, James Dean, Burt Reynolds and Laurence Olivier Estates
The estates of Judy Garland, James Dean and more have set an AI audio deal with ElevenLabs for its Reader App that converts digital text to voiceover.
variety.com
Judy Garland has been dead for FIFTY YEARS and she's STILL being exploited by executives.
New Senate bill seeks to protect artists' and journalists' content from AI use | TechCrunch
A new bill introduced by a bipartisan group of senators seeks to protect artists, songwriters and journalists from having their content used to train AI models or generate AI content without their consent.
techcrunch.com
In theory a simple script to edit the files enmasse would work, assuming the format in question even has the option to embed said data. Of course you would also have to ban AI from using legacy data that has been floating around since before the regulation was put in place. In practice I don't really see a good way to enforce it without FORCING AI companies to open up their black boxes for public scrutiny and somehow I don't think Congress will actually implement THAT part.
The trouble is if they've been uploaded to literally anything other than a personal website, making such changes en masse would be either prohibitively difficult (DeviantArt) or outright impossible (X) depending on whether the site has a no-questions-asked image replacement option. We might see some of them start offering a built-in tool to apply the tag to selected pieces or one's entire gallery, but ironically the most anti-AI art site I know of is FurAffinity, whose owner would probably take 80 years to figure out how to code such a thing.
A better way to handle this would be to simply treat no-AI-allowed as the default, similar to how copyright law treats no-unauthorized-use as the default, and make artist incorporate a special tag into pieces they do want to let AI data farms scrape.
A better way to handle this would be to simply treat no-AI-allowed as the default, similar to how copyright law treats no-unauthorized-use as the default, and make artist incorporate a special tag into pieces they do want to let AI data farms scrape.