Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

PrimalxConvoy

NOT a New Member.
Citizen
And I wrote hamas. Because I meant hamas.

Yes, there should be peace between palestine and israel. Unfortunately: hamas is a political organization, a terrorist organization and exists solely to pursue an ideological goal through murder. They are in the way. There needs to be a new government in palestine if there is to be any long term, lasting peace. You might be able to broker something short term with hamas, but it'll only last until they think they can get another chance to attack.

Do I know how to do to get them out of the way, preferably without civilian casualties? No, even if they weren't using schools and hospitals and the people there in as meat shields. The best way would be getting palestinians to rise up and rid themselves of their oppressors: but it's a catch 22 because that would require their government (hamas.) to actively negotiate in good faith to see towards improving the standard of living for everyone: and they won't because then they won't have pissed off, uneducated, unemployed people with no sight of a future to fight and die for them.

Given what was happening in israel until the shooting started: there probably needs to be a new government in israel too, but they're closer it than palestine is. At least there's something of a democracy there.

The IRA in Ireland were/are (possibly American-funded) terrorists and a peace deal was brokered eventually.

 

wonko the sane?

You may test that assumption at your convinience.
Citizen
And the IRA had a goal that wasn't genocide. I'm not saying you can't broker a peace deal with a terrorist organization: I'm saying you probably can't with hamas, because their entire schtick killing all the jews and destroying an entire country.
 

PrimalxConvoy

NOT a New Member.
Citizen
And the IRA had a goal that wasn't genocide. I'm not saying you can't broker a peace deal with a terrorist organization: I'm saying you probably can't with hamas, because their entire schtick killing all the jews and destroying an entire country.
I wasn't aware Hamas, as nefarious as they might be, had a genocidal goal. It has certainly massacred entire communities, but I'm not sure if it officially amounts to genocide?

I've provided some topical/related links, but as some of them are a bit off-topic, I've put them behind spoiler tags.

- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamas

- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide

However, I did find one article that seems to back up/repeat your claim above:

- https://archive.md/RNiIk ( Paywall circumvented link)
- https://www.theatlantic.com/interna...s-covenant-israel-attack-war-genocide/675602/ (original link)

As for the IRA not being genocidal, you're right:
- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provisional_Irish_Republican_Army (part of the article states that there was no evidence of ethnic cleansing in the attacks carried out by the IRA).
 
Last edited:

Anonymous X

Well-known member
Citizen
Yeah, you can’t really compare the Provos to Hamas. The former were/are essentially secular nationalists (despite the common framing of the conflict as Catholic vs Protestant, when it was really about nationalisms), the latter are clerical-fascists with overtly genocidal aims.
 

Dekafox

Fabulously Foxy Dragon
Citizen
Well that's certainly not worrying at all.


8afc3c1080edd048.png


On the one hand, you do want to stop propoganda... on the other, in the hands of a right-wing government leaning towards heavy authoritarianism, I don't know Id trust them to enforce it properly. Especially since "Nation's morale" could easily be applied to people protesting for any reason against the government. Plus if they start pulling the equivalent of Patriot Act extensions on this...
 

Thylacine 2000

Well-known member
Citizen
When the IRA blew up a pub and killed 12 civilians, they apologized and said they would change their tactics afterwards.


I am not sugarcoating the Troubles, but in that conflict you truly do not see the atavistic, fang-toothed celebration of rape, infanticide, and genocide that is how Hamas speaks about Jews.

(Also note that part of the way the Troubles ended was by building giant walls to segregate the populations, which would totally have been called "apartheid" if Jews had been involved)

 

wonko the sane?

You may test that assumption at your convinience.
Citizen
I'm honestly surprised the palestinian government isn't already doing this...

*starts reading the article*

SHLOMO Kharhi... oh... oooohhhh... yeah, this is very not good. I can't see this being abused at all.
 

Teufel

Active member
Citizen
And the IRA had a goal that wasn't genocide. I'm not saying you can't broker a peace deal with a terrorist organization: I'm saying you probably can't with hamas, because their entire schtick killing all the jews and destroying an entire country.

Case in point, this interview from a senior Hamas figure on Russian TV shortly after the massacres.


"In the past couple years, Hamas has adopted a 'rational' approach. It did not go into any war, and did not join the Islamic Jihad in its recent battle. But all this was part of Hamas's strategy in preparing for this attack. Of course. We made them think that Hamas was busy with governing Gaza, and that it wanted to focus on the 2.5 million Palestinians (in Gaza), and has abandoned the resistance altogether. All the while, under the table, Hamas was preparing for this big attack."

Aside from the scale of the murders and kidnappings, Hamas is openly bragging they only sort of played nice as part of a years long plan to orchestrate a surprise attack to slaughter Israelis. There can never be a ceasefire or peace with them.

"We have been preparing for this for two years. We have local factories for everything. We have rockets with ranges of 250 kms, 160 kms, 80 kms, 45 kms, and 10 kms. We have factories for mortars and their shells. We have factories for manufacturing B-7 and B-10 guns and their shells. We have factories for manufacturing Kalashnikov rifles and their bullets."


I'm skeptical the IDF can actually destroy Hamas. They're not going to line up in formation to get wiped out and have no problem melting into the general populace for a guerilla war. Trying to occupy Gaza again is going to be an urban bloodbath for everyone, Hamas has had years to prepare and is going to do everything it can to maximize civilian casualties for peak international outrage and pressure against Israel. But the IDF can destroy their factories, cave in their tunnels, and seriously hamper their ability to fire thousands of indiscriminate rockets. Occupying Gaza is really jivey option which is why Israel ripped up its settlements and got out years ago, but it's the only one Hamas left them with now.
 

Anonymous X

Well-known member
Citizen
When the IRA blew up a pub and killed 12 civilians, they apologized and said they would change their tactics afterwards.


I am not sugarcoating the Troubles, but in that conflict you truly do not see the atavistic, fang-toothed celebration of rape, infanticide, and genocide that is how Hamas speaks about Jews.

(Also note that part of the way the Troubles ended was by building giant walls to segregate the populations, which would totally have been called "apartheid" if Jews had been involved)

Speaking personally, I still have very strong memories of the Troubles, even though I’ve always lived in England. Something related to the conflict would always be on the UK-wide evening news. We had bomb drills at secondary school to prepare if the IRA ever planted explosives in or near our school (they had previously attempted to bomb the town). We were told that the school would’ve had a warning by phone giving time to evacuate were a bombing to ever occur. So not exactly a surprise attack, had that plan been followed through.
 

wonko the sane?

You may test that assumption at your convinience.
Citizen
The IDF absolutely can root out hamas.

But the act of doing it will simply create the conditions for another, even worse organization to rise up, to continue to abuse and murder the palestinians and israelis alike. The only way out of this (in which the genocide card is off the table for both sides for hopefully a long time.) is to CAPTURE as much of the hamas leadership as possible, overtake gaza as a politcal entity, and then restore the palestinian economy, standard of living, and setting a hard deadline to do this under while helping them build a new, long term government they build themselves. To literally sweep in, rebuild and rebuild better than they had, handing them the ******* keys, and walking away. After all, the highest act of charity in the jewish faith is an act that leads to self sufficiency for the receiver.

They need to show that partnership, cooperation will be a better outcome for everyone... but there is still the hurdle of the brainwashed, murdering, psychopaths hiding in the population.
 

CoffeeHorse

Exhausted, but still standing.
Staff member
Council of Elders
Citizen
The U.S. military has selected roughly 2,000 troops to prepare for a potential deployment to support Israel, U.S. defense officials said. The troops are tasked with missions like advising and medical support, the officials said, and they are from across the U.S. armed services. They aren't intended to serve in a combat role, the officials said. No infantry have been put on prepare-to-deploy order.

And here we go.
 

wonko the sane?

You may test that assumption at your convinience.
Citizen
Calm your hooves coffee, canada does stuff like this all the time. Those troops won't get close enough to the fighting that, should one of them get hurt or die, there would even be a question of intent.

They will be field medics, nurses, mechanics, cooks and trainers. They'll be building hospital tents, barracks, and camps for the displaced. They'll be dealing with administrative tasks, and running papers. They won't touch their weapons outside of routine training.

Because the US knows that if they openly send in troops, it's antagonizing all the hostile powers in the region and demanding they escalate, and the hostile powers know that if they kill even ONE us soldier on purpose: it's game ******* over. It'll be afghanistan all over again, and they don't want the US cutting off their business.
 

PrimalxConvoy

NOT a New Member.
Citizen
When the IRA blew up a pub and killed 12 civilians, they apologized and said they would change their tactics afterwards.


I am not sugarcoating the Troubles, but in that conflict you truly do not see the atavistic, fang-toothed celebration of rape, infanticide, and genocide that is how Hamas speaks about Jews.

(Also note that part of the way the Troubles ended was by building giant walls to segregate the populations, which would totally have been called "apartheid" if Jews had been involved)

The IRA killed about 1,700 people during their time. I understand that's small-fry compared to what Hamas has done in the space of a few days, but it wasn't just a pub or two.
 

MrBlud

Well-known member
Citizen
The IDF absolutely can root out hamas.

But the act of doing it will simply create the conditions for another, even worse organization to rise up, to continue to abuse and murder the palestinians and israelis alike. The only way out of this (in which the genocide card is off the table for both sides for hopefully a long time.) is to CAPTURE as much of the hamas leadership as possible, overtake gaza as a politcal entity, and then restore the palestinian economy, standard of living, and setting a hard deadline to do this under while helping them build a new, long term government they build themselves. To literally sweep in, rebuild and rebuild better than they had, handing them the ******* keys, and walking away. After all, the highest act of charity in the jewish faith is an act that leads to self sufficiency for the receiver.

They need to show that partnership, cooperation will be a better outcome for everyone... but there is still the hurdle of the brainwashed, murdering, psychopaths hiding in the population.

Yep, even in a country like the US you are probably going to have around 30% of the population be deplorable assholes that have zero compunction about using violence to achieve political ends.

And that’s keeping in mind the day-to-day life here is pretty much the furthest thing away from what the people experience in Gaza.

Improving the life of the Palestinians is the only long term way to curb further violence but that’s going to run into *severe* pushback both from Hamas and a fair number of Israelites rightfully incensed by the latest attack.
 

wonko the sane?

You may test that assumption at your convinience.
Citizen
So do we. We always start with """advisors""".
If the whole regiment wants to play at arm chair admirals, let them. So long as they aren't shooting, or getting shot at. The US has forward operating bases all over the world, this is literally what you guys have done since world war 2.

Well, that and hug with south america.
 


Top Bottom