Stephen harper has officially endorsed poilievre for federal tory leadership. Here's the thing: There have been two (FOUR if you count the interns.) other leaders since harper, so why is harper giving his endorsement news worthy? Harper was the last actually successful tory leader. He was prime minister, the rest were barely opposition.
Harper is also the guy who seriously boosted the extremist indoctrination for the tories: american like assholes doing stupid jive like the trucker convoys (who've threatened to protest at the goddamn pope reconciliation visit.) and the anti-vax mandate movement are harpers fault. So of course the extremist will endorse the extremist: you can't have a good culture war without a screaming ******* lunatic at the helm.
Still: this isn't necessarily bad news. This means the tory leadership is far more likely to vote favourably for poilievre, and it increases his odds of becoming the next short term, "not even one mandate" failed leader in an ongoing string of failed leaders. The tory party is still on track to sunder.
Harper is also the guy who seriously boosted the extremist indoctrination for the tories: american like assholes doing stupid jive like the trucker convoys (who've threatened to protest at the goddamn pope reconciliation visit.) and the anti-vax mandate movement are harpers fault. So of course the extremist will endorse the extremist: you can't have a good culture war without a screaming ******* lunatic at the helm.
Still: this isn't necessarily bad news. This means the tory leadership is far more likely to vote favourably for poilievre, and it increases his odds of becoming the next short term, "not even one mandate" failed leader in an ongoing string of failed leaders. The tory party is still on track to sunder.