There's so much to unpack here. Let's start with the Trump part. Not only is that description the exact polar opposite of everything Trump is and has ever been, most of it seems to have stemmed entirely from the author's own head. In all Trump's years of lying about his accomplishments, I don't recall him ever claiming to be a Marine major, a "fit Apollonian warrior", a scientist, a doctor, or someone who had already "solved all worldly woe" before age 70 which is the age he was when he ran for office. There is a limit to the level of bullshit even
he would expect people to buy.
But then there's the Jesus stuff. The first—well, I was going to say "sentence" but then I looked at the punctuation and realized
this whole thing is one massive sentence. And a solid contender for
the Edward Bulwer-Lytton contest if ever I saw one.
OK, got sidetracked for a moment. The first
clause of this grammatical snarl suggests that the public perception of Jesus has been watered down by modern liberal society. A complaint at least as old as
The Screwtape Letters, and one I won't even bother to argue with. But instead of seeking to confront that idea with the truth, apparently the author takes issue with the canonical accounts or even maybe thinks that Jesus was genuinely a loser baby who accomplished nothing and died like a bitch, which is at least in line with what like 90% of modern-day Republicans
would think of him if they had been alive in his day, let's be real.
So instead this is... alternate history, maybe? "What if Jesus had been a cool dude like (my utterly delusional idea of) Trump and not a wimpy loser?" Except even that doesn't make sense because
there was no such thing as the Marines in Ancient Rome.
Seriously, I actually want to find this book and find out what it's actually about, except if the level of basic literacy on display is on the same level as the description, I might not come out the other side any more enlightened.