Yeah, I think you might be right. I didn't imagine I could think less of trump supporters: but you managed to make it happen man, congrats!
Traitor Watch - The 45 & 47 Thread
- Thread starter Wheelimus
- Start date
The bar is already so low that it's a tripping hazard in Hell, and they still find ways to go lower.
I think he has the money they know how to use in the campaign accounts and especially if he is going to lose, he doesn't want another dollar in that account if it could be in his own account instead.
That's been his motive all along: it's why some of the campaign infrastructure is and always has been in trump properties, paying full value on the rent.
Unless it has changed, the secret service have to buy memberships at Mar-a-Lago so the they can protect him there.
Whenever he offers me a free trip to Mar-a-Lago, "trip" refers specifically to the transportation and nothing else. The Mar-a-Lago part isn't free.
I'd also question whether anyone connected to his campaign could possibly find a way to turn additional funding into more votes anyway. It's not like he doesn't get all the attention he needs for free from the media; he's just incapable of saying or doing anything on camera that doesn't make him look even worse.
don't need to campaign when you can cheat.
It has not: the secret service has been badly in the red since they had to start securing trumps body.
The solution seems simple enough: Force Trump to waive the membership requirement for Secret Service agents, and withhold S.S. protection at Mar-A-Lago if he refuses.
It's a solution, certainly.
No one will do it. Trump won't willingly give up a source of income OR free bodyguards. Republicans in general will fight any legislation attempting to do this act, and democrats won't bring any such legislation forward because of how badly republicans will spin it to make democrats look bad.
There might be traction for a lessened security presence after trump gets sentenced in november, but no one will ever suggest removing it entirely, it's way too easy to make it look like the democrats are trying to kill trump.
No one will do it. Trump won't willingly give up a source of income OR free bodyguards. Republicans in general will fight any legislation attempting to do this act, and democrats won't bring any such legislation forward because of how badly republicans will spin it to make democrats look bad.
There might be traction for a lessened security presence after trump gets sentenced in november, but no one will ever suggest removing it entirely, it's way too easy to make it look like the democrats are trying to kill trump.
Eh, let the campaigns or the individuals pay for security: otherwise your taxes pay for cops and 911 services.
There certainly can't be any legislation or policy change right now that decreases Trump's protection in any way. Only two attempts in this century and they are both him this summer.
I was trying to think what you'd write when there IS a climate to do and I think Rhinox is on the right track. The secret service has to use space that is owned or paid for by the protected, not rent or buy adjacent space. In almost every case it is moot. Presidents and former Presidents generally live in single family homes.
Trump is in a weird spot on this last one, because it as at a business that he owns that generally would be considered responsible for handling some level of security for its patrons. Not so sure I'd want to golf there if I was any other rich guy with enemies and found out someone snuck a military style rifle in there and hid all day waiting to shoot someone.
I was trying to think what you'd write when there IS a climate to do and I think Rhinox is on the right track. The secret service has to use space that is owned or paid for by the protected, not rent or buy adjacent space. In almost every case it is moot. Presidents and former Presidents generally live in single family homes.
Trump is in a weird spot on this last one, because it as at a business that he owns that generally would be considered responsible for handling some level of security for its patrons. Not so sure I'd want to golf there if I was any other rich guy with enemies and found out someone snuck a military style rifle in there and hid all day waiting to shoot someone.
They're a match made in hell.
www.thecut.com
A Guide to J.D. Vance’s Most Unhinged Public Statements
In resurfaced comments, Trump’s running mate says he’s “disturbed” by teachers who don’t have children of their own.
www.thecut.com
Wait, so it's designed by him, but "not manufactured, distributed, or sold by" him?
Trump has been licensing his likeness since the 80's. He never does any of the work, he lets others do that, and he takes his piece right off the top. No effort required on his part, just income and he's not responsible for stuff like infrastructure, taxes, returns or customer service.
Designed is a slushy word. If he said he should be looking sideways and the words should be there, he could say he designed it.