Transformers: Rise of the Beasts

lastmaximal

Administrator
Staff member
Council of Elders
Citizen
I couldn't disagree more with the "less humans more Transformers" stances, even regarding ROTB. The human element should always be a part of these narratives for various reasons. Of course it's best if done well, but even done middlingly is better than to not have it.
 

lastmaximal

Administrator
Staff member
Council of Elders
Citizen
Michael Bay’s five movies already “poisoned the well” for Transformers as far as audience expectation goes. They’ll look for the three V’s, vulgarity, violence, visuals.

If you stray from that (like Bumblebee) EVEN IF you’re the better movie (like Bumblebee) you’re going to underperform (like Bumblebee) because that’s not what audiences have been conditioned to want from a Transformers movie.
Ehh, idk. I agree with how his formula has poisoned the well, but it's less that people want the same crap from new product and more that people have come to associate the films as a whole with that crap, to the point where any new product is preemptively dismissed as more of the same, and it'll take a WHILE to erode that.

I don't think people rejected Bumblebee or anything so much as many might have just not checked it out, or checked it out and didn't seem it impressive enough to warrant renewed attention.
 

Sabrblade

Continuity Nutcase
Citizen
Speaking of Michael Bay, according to this interview at Variety with Paramount CEO Brian Robbins, while Bay may no longer be directing these films, it turns out he still has final say on everything that goes into these movies, and has the power to veto anything he doesn't agree with.


Robbins calls it having “a big idea.” And in the case of the latest “Transformers” film, that eureka moment was to have G.I. Joe enter the robots’ cinematic universe, bringing together two of Paramount’s biggest franchises. But that required Robbins to convince Hasbro, the toy company behind both sets of characters, and producers Steven Spielberg and Michael Bay, to let the studio bring the worlds together. And Bay’s approval was tricky, because he was worried that merging the series would cheapen the other “Transformers” movies. “I called him 50 times,” Robbins says. “I would not let him off the hook. And when he finally stopped dodging my calls, we got him to sign off.”
 

Haywire

Collecter of Gobots and Godzilla
Citizen
Transformers needs human characters for the same reason that Doctor Who needs human companions: there needs to be someone in-story to explain things to when the audience needs some background. Otherwise, the Autobots or The Doctor are just explaining things to themselves (or making Marvel Comics-style info dump statements) for no real reason.

If VFX was the only hurdle, the Autobots could spend most of the movie in vehicle mode. Knight Rider did it for 4 seasons back in the 80s; KITT was absolutely a full character in the show, and I'm pretty sure never once needed CGI to do it.
 

Undead Scottsman

Well-known member
Citizen
Knight Rider wasn't about KITT though, he was a supporting character. The main character was Michael Knight i.e. David Hasselhoff. K.I.T.T. was basically the C3PO/R2D2 of that series: The robot helper for the main character.

"They can just stay in vehicle mode" is the kind of suggestion that sounds good on paper, but I highly doubt it'd play well with audiences without still having to rely on human characters.
 

PrimalxConvoy

NOT a New Member.
Citizen
I'm looking forward to the animated film, as then we can finally have a film with less humans and more robots, which for me is much more preferable to the live action films. I think the main reason we haven't had a fully TF-centred film is due to budget. It would cost too much to have a fully CG TF film at this point.
 

Haywire

Collecter of Gobots and Godzilla
Citizen
Knight Rider wasn't about KITT though, he was a supporting character. The main character was Michael Knight i.e. David Hasselhoff.
I'm sure a lot of viewers tuned in for The Hoff, but I know that back when it was airing, I watched for KITT. (And watched Airwolf, and the Transformers, Gobots, and Pole Position cartoons; I can guarantee I remember more about the non-human characters in all of those) (and, yes, I consider The Lady a character, even though she never speaks a line of dialog)
"They can just stay in vehicle mode" is the kind of suggestion that sounds good on paper, but I highly doubt it'd play well with audiences without still having to rely on human characters.
And in a movie titled Transformers, nobody wants them to stay in vehicle mode. However, as a counterpoint to:
"Keeping the money tight" runs in opposite of "Focusing on the robot cast" given every second they're on screen costs VFX money.
The Transformers characters can have screen time and even character development without always using expensive VFX money. Yes, they will need human characters to play off of, but my point was that Transformers don't need VFX for every minute of screen time. They just need to be treated as characters and not just props that show up for the Bayhem sequences.
 

PrimalxConvoy

NOT a New Member.
Citizen
I'm sure a lot of viewers tuned in for The Hoff, but I know that back when it was airing, I watched for KITT. (And watched Airwolf, and the Transformers, Gobots, and Pole Position cartoons; I can guarantee I remember more about the non-human characters in all of those) (and, yes, I consider The Lady a character, even though she never speaks a line of dialog)

And in a movie titled Transformers, nobody wants them to stay in vehicle mode. However, as a counterpoint to:

The Transformers characters can have screen time and even character development without always using expensive VFX money. Yes, they will need human characters to play off of, but my point was that Transformers don't need VFX for every minute of screen time. They just need to be treated as characters and not just props that show up for the Bayhem sequences.

Yes, I agree somewhat. There was that scene in the ROTB where Optimus and BB meet each other incognito and communicate via light flashes, horns and engine revs. I rather liked that bit.
 

Sabrblade

Continuity Nutcase
Citizen
The IDW Holomatter avatars are tailor made to increase robot characterization without running up the VFX budget yet remain almost wholly unused.
Or even better, just make a Tokusatsu adaptation of Masterforce.
 

Superomegaprime

Wondering bot
Citizen
Or even better, just make a Tokusatsu adaptation of Masterforce.

Or just take ideas from Masterforce, like the Headmasters, not saying have kids be the headmasters but the idea that they have some kind of element that creates the transforming suit around them or they could be Headmasters that pretend to be human and when they need their larger bodies, the human form opens up to reveal the inner robot and they transform and the human shell closes back up and moves to safety acting seperately from the core robot, yet they are still the same character!
 

MrBlud

Well-known member
Citizen
I feel like the GI Joe stuff is going to wind up very much like what happened at the end of ROTB but with the whole Autobot cast.
 

CoffeeHorse

Exhausted, but still standing.
Staff member
Council of Elders
Citizen
The IDW Holomatter avatars are tailor made to increase robot characterization without running up the VFX budget yet remain almost wholly unused.

Honestly, I get it. Holomatter avatars would allow more characterization, and make the robots more relatable, but I think Paramount purposefully does not want that. Paramount wants the robots to be big. They're over our heads in every sense. Holomatter avatars would make them too relatable.
 

Sabrblade

Continuity Nutcase
Citizen
Honestly, I get it. Holomatter avatars would allow more characterization, and make the robots more relatable, but I think Paramount purposefully does not want that. Paramount wants the robots to be big. They're over our heads in every sense. Holomatter avatars would make them too relatable.
Not only that, but I realize now that the idea of Transformers adopting the forms of humans and turning back into giant robots whenever it's fightin' time would give the impression of them being less like "giant alien robots from outer space" and more like "human superheroes that can morph their bodies into giant robotic forms".
 

CoffeeHorse

Exhausted, but still standing.
Staff member
Council of Elders
Citizen
As profitable as superheroes are (except Flash) I'm glad Paramount recognizes that Transforners are something different and need to be.
 

unluckiness

Somehow still sane
Citizen
Holomatter avatars just mean less screen time for the giant robots in the giant robot movie. They don’t even have the stakes of sending in the human partners to do stuff since they don’t really exist. Not a fan.

it’s just human sidekicks with extra technobabble.
 
Last edited:

lastmaximal

Administrator
Staff member
Council of Elders
Citizen
Speaking of Michael Bay, according to this interview at Variety with Paramount CEO Brian Robbins, while Bay may no longer be directing these films, it turns out he still has final say on everything that goes into these movies, and has the power to veto anything he doesn't agree with.


TBH, I don't disagree with Bay entirely here, but then I am very lukewarm on the whole integrating GI Joe thing. The only thing I halfway like about it is that approaching it from this vector lends itself to a more comic-booky, sci-fi-y take that may play better because it isn't a Woo Realistic Military Yeah vibe that no one but a very loud fandom faction of Abe Simpsons wants.

I'm not too surprised by the veto power, as that seems to be something producers tend to hold on to. This is going to be easy to be alarmist about (oh no! Bay can still make or break the movies!) but given we've gotten two movies that are solid-to-good and distinct enough from his stuff strongly suggests it's not a big deal.

The Transformers characters can have screen time and even character development without always using expensive VFX money. Yes, they will need human characters to play off of, but my point was that Transformers don't need VFX for every minute of screen time. They just need to be treated as characters and not just props that show up for the Bayhem sequences.

The Transformers are walking VFX. They need VFX to exist on screen even if they're standing there.

But I agree that TF time onscreen would be better used for characterization moments that need less action and thus less in the way of VFX. Stand, sit, talk, react, interact. No need to constantly transform, blow things up, run, etc.

Not only that, but I realize now that the idea of Transformers adopting the forms of humans and turning back into giant robots whenever it's fightin' time would give the impression of them being less like "giant alien robots from outer space" and more like "human superheroes that can morph their bodies into giant robotic forms".

Holomatter avatars are frankly a weird solution for anyone wanting "more Transformers, less humans", because these are literally going to be humans onscreen that we're just saying are Transformers.

Sure, I guess some people could technically be "proven right" that "you don't need human characters" because now Prime, Mirage, Arcee, and Wheeljack can infiltrate the Peruvian festival themselves rather than rely on Noah and Elena. But surprise, those amount to human characters onscreen, and you didn't fall in love with this franchise because of human figures that are secretly projected from giant robots that turned into cars and things. However much green-blue digital effect filtering or voice flanging you put there.

It also sharply downplays the "differentness" that Transformers/human interactions run strongly on, not least in the immediately arresting sense of scale. Noah Diaz being cajoled into infiltrating a museum by [actual Pete Davidson] while [actual Peter Cullen] stands by glowering is an SNL sketch I'd like to see, but has none of the same feel of the interaction between Noah, Mirage, and Prime.

And of course even if Paramount were to be fine with it (doubtful, given this is core to the spectacle that makes these movies), I doubt Hasbro would enjoy having the central gimmick they sell toys based on so downplayed.
 


Top Bottom