The Twit destroying Twitter is a Twaitor

Pocket

jumbled pile of person
Citizen
I'm beginning to think Luigi shot the wrong CEO. I'm also really hating the fact that I'm beginning to think that violence may be the answer this time... I've NEVER thought that way before and I'm a little scared that I'm trending that way now.
Welcome to the dark side; we have cookies.

There's no such thing as shooting the wrong CEO. Luigi just didn't shoot the CEO whose death would have benefited society the most.
Counterpoint: no one wants to shoot the costco CEO.
Amendment: it's only wrong to shoot one particular CEO.
Apparently I'm out of the loop. What's this about?
 

Ungnome

Grand Empress of the Empire of One Square Foot.
Citizen
I think it's in relation to Costco rejecting the pressure to end it's DEI initiatives and NOT bending the knee to Trump.
 

wonko the sane?

You may test that assumption at your convinience.
Citizen
Actually, it's over the costco hotdog. Similar story for the CEO of arizona iced tea. They saw no reason to gouge people, or extort over basic commodities, and were happy to take lesser profits.

You know, as businesses should be run: Well treated workers and a reasonable expectation of profit.
 

Ultra Magnus13

Active member
Citizen
Actually, it's over the costco hotdog. Similar story for the CEO of arizona iced tea. They saw no reason to gouge people, or extort over basic commodities, and were happy to take lesser profits.

You know, as businesses should be run: Well treated workers and a reasonable expectation of profit.

They arn't making "less profit" on the hotdog soda combo, they are losing money on it, it's a marketing gimmick/expense.
 

CoffeeHorse

Exhausted, but still standing.
Staff member
Council of Elders
Citizen
Which is an entirely valid strategy they teach in any business school.
 

Ungnome

Grand Empress of the Empire of One Square Foot.
Citizen
It won't pass, but I love this:

 

Ungnome

Grand Empress of the Empire of One Square Foot.
Citizen
In the good timeline branching from this one at this moment it would pass and SpaceX's stock would TANK overnight. They would be forced to either fire Musk as CEO or Musk would have to quit USDS(not calling it DOGE anymore, gonna call it the name Congress gave it when it was originally created during the Obama administration
)
 

Dekafox

Fabulously Foxy Dragon
Citizen
Apparently Musk actually put two people in charge of the Treasury systems, and one is a 19 year old who hangs out at Russian forums and has tried to rent DDOS botnets.


Supposedly they're going to get Read Only access approved by a judge according to CNN, but they apparently claimed Read Only also just before we heard they were pushing untested patches to production.

Also:
 

Pale Rider

...and Hell followed with him.
Citizen
FB friend:
Elon Musk supporters thought he was going to colonize Mars, but he colonized the US government instead.

This is what happens when people ignore reality and stupidly fall for a carefully crafted public image.
Elon Musk's unregulated paradise would be heaven for bad people, and hell for good people. Regulations don't just keep bad people in check: they reward good people for doing the right thing.

Without regulations, bad people get rewarded for behaving in wildly irresponsible ways, while good people are effectively punished for their own good deeds because they are costly and now seem pointless, because any good you do with your ethical restraint is easily outweighed by all the damage that the bad people are gleefully doing.

Take pollution for example: if you take away all anti-pollution regulations, some people might still try not to pollute. But for every one of those people, there will be five people whose pollution footprint skyrockets, and the good person's efforts will seem completely futile and pointlessly costly. What's the point of carefully disposing of your waste properly, when your neighbour is dumping paint thinner into the river that you share with him?

Look at traffic laws as another example: eliminate all penalties for running red lights and stop signs, and those behaviours would become rampant. Traffic chaos would ensue. Deaths would increase. And you could not possibly stop this by driving responsibly yourself: that's not how shared environments work.

Contrary to libertarian fantasies about self-regulating markets and invisible hands, the elimination of regulations will drop us all to the lowest common denominator, and reward the worst among us.
Apparently, when techbros say "move fast and break things", the thing they want to break is the law.
 

Anonymous X

Well-known member
Citizen
Remember in the film Casino (Dir: Martin Scorsese) where Robert DeNiro’s character is running a casino, despite not legally being allowed to, and there’s also an official boss of the casino who is just a figurehead? Yeah.
 

wonko the sane?

You may test that assumption at your convinience.
Citizen
Yeah, we knew that back before the inauguration. Trump didn't want the job, he just wanted the perks: including keeping his ass out of jail.
 

Rhinox

too old for this
Citizen
I see no downside to this, honestly. I have yet to meet the cybertruck owner who isn't an absolute tool. And, yeah, I'm willing to paint this with the big brush right now.
 


Top Bottom